Search Site

Ambiguity, the Nemesis of a Settlement Agreement

The importance of making clear agreements, not subject to other interpretation cannot be emphasized enough. Any apparent ambiguity can open the door to dispute. And then, sometimes even judges disagree on the intended interpretation. So, while agreements between parties to lawsuits is encouraged, it is necessary to ensure that such agreements are drafted in a way that make clear the parties’ intentions and that deal with all the nuances of the agreement.

Case details

A specific case where a husband and wife disputed the meaning of their settlement agreement serves as an example. In this particular case, according to their property settlement, the husband agreed to give the wife a real estate commission of $25,000 that he had previously earned through the sale of certain ranch property. As the seller submitted payments, the commission would be his wife’s money instead of his money. When the seller defaulted on payments after the wife had received $14,317.16, she claimed that her ex-husband owed her the difference for the $25,000 total.

Both the husband and wife asserted that the property settlement was ambiguous and made motions for a summary judgment. Summary judgments require a court to deliver a ruling based on the facts without a full trial. The trial court found in the wife’s favor, rendering the summary judgment that the husband owed her $10,682.84, which was the remainder of the $25,000 commission.

Supreme Court of Texas reviews the appeal

The court of appeals confirmed, the husband appealed, and Coker v. Coker went before the Supreme Court of Texas. The judges considered similar cases that had set precedents, which included:

  • Ascertaining the true intentions of parties as expressed in the agreement
  • Considering the entire writing in an effort to harmonize and give effect to all the provisions of the contract so none are rendered meaningless
  • Determining whether the agreement was worded so it can be given certain or definite legal meaning or interpretation, which means it is not ambiguous
  • Determining an ambiguous contract as one where meaning is uncertain and doubtful or reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning
  • That granting a summary judgment motion is improper when a contract contains ambiguity

One Supreme Court justice found the agreement ambiguous. Therefore, the summary judgment was improper, and he ruled that the case should go to trial before the lower trial court. The three other Supreme Court justices dissented, finding that the agreement was not ambiguous and the husband owed the wife the full $25,000 as promised. The overall decision went to the wife.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact us for help with your divorce, child custody, or other family law issue
Robert Reid McInvale Attorney Photo
Robert Reid McInvale
Attorney at Law

Robert Reid McInvale is an experienced family law attorney with a comprehensive practice in Lubbock. He provides dedicated and strong advocacy for his clients, helping them with all the issues surrounding their divorce, separation, child custody, and other marriage and family matters. Attorney McInvale—Reid to clients and friends—seemed destined for a law career. Born while his father was attending Emory University Law School, Reid grew up in Manchester, GA. His father was the city attorney for many years, as well as head of the Manchester Chamber of Commerce. It is in the family blood to become lawyers and help people get justice. U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall is part of the McInvale family tree.

What our clients are saying

  • yelp

    Highly recommend him! Excellent legal representation. Highly skilled, held in high regard in the legal network, professional, intelligent and gets the results you need.

    Read more

    Marianne K.

  • google

    I rarely take time to post online reviews but our experience with Reid McInvale has been so good that I want to do whatever I can to help other people find this attorney. it was overwhelming when we started looking for a divorce and child custody att...

    Read more

    Cheryl Wiker

  • google

    Don't waste your time and money searching and interviewing other lawyers. Mr. McInvale did my custody case in 2010 and I have always returned to him when I had an issue or a question. He is a very truth speaking and up front attorney. He is NOT like ...

    Read more

    Mandi Friestad

  • google

    Mr.McInvale gets the job done. Most definitely willrecommend him and consider in the future as necessary to family & friends! If you need a Divorce call him.

    Read more

    Julia Coleman

See all reviews
Contact us

Quick Contact Form